Before beginning this post, I need to  bring up a couple of qualifiers.  Kevin found an article on one of his  preferred websites, FreeRepublic.com (we don't see eye to eye  politically, but he finds some interesting stuff here) that he brought  to my attention.  I planned to read this posting, but never got around  to it and now neither he nor I can find it.  Therefore, I can't  specifically tell you what was said or whether there was a referral to a  more accepted scientific journal or otherwise to provide more of an  explanation.  And, again, since I never read the article, I can't tell  you whether I agree with the way things are presented.  But I've been  thinking about it on and off since he told me about it about 1-2 months  ago.  I just wish I could have found the original article, both to  actually read what it says and to provide a link here.  Kevin did say  that he remembered that it was the perspective of this one member who  pointed out that they WEREN'T an expert and didn't remember any links  with supporting documentation. (boy, that's a lot of bunk, but it's the  truth)
This posting talked about autism as, not a disability, but  as an evolutionary step forward.  When he first mentioned this, I was  extremely skeptical, but as I said, I've been thinking about this a lot,  and find it a very interesting viewpoint (regardless of whether it's  true or not).  When one thinks about many of the brilliant and  revolutionary minds in human history, many of them are now thought to  have been autistic (W.A. Mozart, A. Einstein, V. VanGogh, etc.).  These  "savants" were very one-sided -- they excelled in one area and were  mediocre in others.  History has proven their brilliance.
Per dictionary.com, the word "Savant" means a person of profound or extensive learning; learned scholar (savant).   Whenever I think about examples of savants, there seems to be evidence  that they are/were autistic.  Is there something there?
We see  similar behaviors in many autistic children.  There is often an area  where they excel.  Their academic experience and success is very  one-sided, often (but not always) towards math/sciences or the arts.   And there are many adults who can say the same (whether or not they were  ever diagnosed to be anywhere on the spectrum, either as children or as  adults).  Is this a sign that we are destined in the next thousand  years to become more "specialists" rather than the "generalists" we have  the expectation for today?
I'm not trying to say that we need to  stop working with these kids and push their differences -- to the  contrary, these kids need the help to be functional members of our  society in order to survive and be happy.  But these kids ARE special.   As Mom to 2 of them, I know this for a fact.  I love to watch all 3 of  my children grow and appreciate the milestones that each of them reach.   I'm just understanding that for some kids, some things are more of an  achievement than they are to others.  I try to celebrate all 3 of my  brilliant kids because of who they individually are.  Every day.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment